The story, as told, is physically impossible

Joyce Riley, the producer of “Beyond Treason” a film about experimentation on US troops, interviews an expert in armed operations.

There are so many problems with the official story.

Here are just a few big ones:

1. The deranged young man who allegedly committed this crime weighed about 120 pounds.

If you calculate all the weapons and ammo the shooter was said to be carrying, it would have weighed nearly as much as him.

2. Breaking into (or shooting open) secured doors such as the school had is not something an amateur is likely to get right on the first try. It’s a SWAT team level skill that requires much training and practice.

Recall in addition to this, the shooter was supposedly carrying 100+ pounds of gear. Quite an acrobatic feat for a 120 pound young man who was not known to be in super fit physical condition.

Related to this point is the strange fact that news reporters never photographed the smashed in door. Why miss out on a photo like that when they’ve exploited every other part of the story?

3. Shooting “hundreds” of rounds in an enclosed space without ear protection (and there is no indication the dead young man found on the scene had any) would blow out your eardrums undermining your inner ear balance and your ability to stand up, let alone engage in these exertions.

Summary: This evil act, if carried out as claimed, required super human physical fitness and a very high level of tactical skill – way beyond shooting skills – that would required serious, sustained training.

What happened?

I don’t know, but the official story is total bullshit.

---

Brazilian school shooting in 2011

Why do they have video in the school of a Third World country and not in the US?

Freedom of speech and thought in academia

Tenured professor James Tracey has been fired by Florida Atlantic University for questioning the accuracy of
reporting about Sandy Hook and other mass shootings.

Here’s an interview with him that sums up his position and his methodology.

It’s now a firing offense to be a reasonable person who asks reasonable questions.

Actually, this has always been the case in academia. Most people in that profession learn early that if they want to advance their careers and keep their jobs they best toe the party line.

The deaths were reported

Viral nonsense.

It went far and wide…the rumor that the FBI did not include the deaths in Sandy Hook in their 2012 crime statistics, thus proving that something is fishy about the Sandy Hook story.

Well, there is plenty fishy about Sandy Hook, but the FBI crime stats report is not one of them.

If anyone actually looks at the report, they will see that the deaths were in fact reported under The State Police reporting section.

“This issue is not going away”

Recorded May 6, 2014.

Experts from various disciplines ask the Sandy Hook school board to release documents they are currently withholding.

When you hear a summary of the anomalies in the story and the kinds of documents that have been withheld you’re going to be scratching your head, even if you you firmly believe that the story happened the way it was reported.

The first two presenters are the strongest and then the quality of speakers varies.

The CIA as organized crime

We’ve screened and edited over 100 hours of commentary on the Sandy Hook (Newtown) shooting.

Our written commentary appears below after the videos.

The key issues in this story are best covered in the videos that appear on these pages.

How he got in

---

AR-15 Reality Check

---

The Mysterious Lanza Family

---

Who was “Adam” Lanza?

---

What do you know about Nancy Lanza?

1. She was a “prepper”

2. She owned a legally registered AR-15

3. She took her son Adam shooting.

When did you “learn” these things?

Very early on, right?

What was the source of this “information?”

Here’s some facts:

1. The Wall Street Journal sent a reporter to visit all the gun ranges in the area to find where Nancy and Adam Lanza went shooting.

Result?

No gun range within a 50 mile radius ever saw them.

2. Connecticut has some of the the strictest gun laws in the nation.

So-called “assault rifles” were already banned in the state.

Thus, is Nancy Lanza did own this gun, she did not own it legally.

3. Nanzy Lanza was a “prepper”

Really?

Who says so?

Where’s the evidence?

An “unnamed source” very soon after the crime occurred – with no follow up evidence.

What else do we know about Nancy Lanza?

What was her profession? Where did she work? Where did she grow up? Who were her parents, siblings, extended family?

We know nothing. Zero.

Why is that?

Yet we “know” she was a prepper, she was gun owner and she practiced shooting at local gun ranges.

All false.

If these “early facts” are false, what else is?

 

Logistics = Reality

The Sandy Hook story as told makes no sense.

That children were murdered in cold blood is not in dispute.

Who did it and how it was done is.

The official story is literally impossible.

This video covers only a few of the points where the story is absolute fabrication.

---

The name-calling idiots are writing in with their commentary.

One woman wrote in to claim that her 125 nephew easily carries his weight in gear in Iraq…

Here’s my reply to her and all the other idiots who insist on denying basic reality and making up stories:

Your nephew, assuming your story is real,
does not carry 125 pounds of gear.

No one in combat in Iraq or Afghanistan
carries anywhere near that much.

Your nephew, assuming he exists, is
a conditioned soldier and that’s what
enables him to carry and operate with
whatever weight he does go out with
(50 to 90 pounds tops)

People can watch all the games
they want. It will not condition them
to carry and maneuver with all the gear
the police say this person brought with
him.

So it’s you YOU who are full of crap
and willfully ignorant to boot.

The children who were murdered
deserve a better investigation than
the garbage that TV-addled idiots
like you support.