There was no torpedo attack in the Gulf of Tonkin
How Lyndon Johnson lied us into a catastrophe
On this day in 1964, Congress passed the “Gulf of Tonkin Resolution” which began massive escalation of the US war and occupation of Viet Nam.
This is a bit slow moving video, but stick with it.
It’s full of gems:
1. The “incident” never happened and at least one of the radar man on duty knew and reported it (“Radar men” were later blamed for the false report.”
2. The Gulf of Tonkin resolution and all the immediate retaliatory actions after the “incident” had to have been planned weeks if not months in advance of August 4th.
3. We were lied into the Vietnam War with a faked incident attributed to North Vietnam – a classic false flag operation.
In 1964, Lyndon Johnson ran and won the presidency on a campaign of “No War in Vietnam.”
Then “something” happened on the night of August 4th in the Gulf of Tonkin (after a previous incident on August 7th) in international waters off of Vietnam.
Just six days later, the normally slow-moving Congress passed the infamous Gulf of Tonkin Resolution which formed the basis for military action in Vietnam.
It was all based on a deliberate fraud as this former active duty Navy lieutenant explains.
One two US Senators opposed the resolution: Senators Wayne Morse (D-OR) and Ernest Gruening (D-AK).
Senator Gruening objected to “sending our American boys into combat in a war in which we have no business, which is not our war, into which we have been misguidedly drawn, which is steadily being escalated”.
Brasscheck TV needs your help
Brasscheck TV relies on viewer contributions to keep going
[do_widget id=et-recent-posts-5]
It happened on December 2
Pawns in a deadly game
An eye witness said she saw three white guys with big athletic builds do the shooting at San Bernardino.
How did that turn into two small-framed, dark skinned people, one of whom was a 90 pound woman?
“An unidentified source told an NPR journalist that witnesses appeared to recognize Farook by his voice and build.”
That’s all the evidence that exists against the couple who was blamed for the attack.
Let’s break this down…
An unidentified source (in other words nobody)…told NPR (a well known “war on terror” propaganda front)…that witnesses (other people, not the person making the claim!)…appeared to recognize…(appeared to recognize!)…Farook by his voice and build (While he was shooting them? Really?)
In other words, the evidence is total bullshit.
What is not bullshit, is that this couple was found HANDCUFFED in a rented car shot to death.
That’s how they were found.
Then the police opened their apartment and left without locking the door and putting up crime tape and the press went in and ruined the integrity of any evidence that might have been there.
To put the icing on the cake, a Facebook account emerged not connected with Tashfeen Malik and now that is the evidence of her “pledging allegiance” to ISIS before the shooting, a group she had no contact with whatsoever.
It’s hard to prove their innocence when they were so thoroughly framed by the FBI and the media.
Brasscheck TV needs your help
Brasscheck TV relies on viewer contributions to keep going
[do_widget id=et-recent-posts-5]
Democrats for war
No investigation
Another false flag in Syria
It’s hard to believe the war mongers are running this show again – but they are.
And it’s working – thanks to the Clinton people i.e. CNN, MSNBC and others.
A conspiracy of lies to promote war to line the pockets of weapons makers. That’s what it’s all about. That’s what it’s always been about.
And Clinton and her millions of idiot supporters are lining up to cheer – just as they did when her husband was bombing civilians in Yugoslavia in the 1990s.
Now the right wing lunatics and fake Democrat lunatics are in perfect accord.
When Fox’s Tucker Carlson is sounding like the voice of reason you know we’re in trouble.
Brasscheck TV needs your help
Brasscheck TV relies on viewer contributions to keep going
Where is the evidence?
“He’s so reasonable, he makes me uncomfortable”
The UK claims that the Russians attacked two people in England with nerve agents.
How realistic is this?
Jimmy Dore comments on Jeremy Corbyn’s statement.
“He’s so reasonable, he makes me uncomfortable.”
Let’s be realistic.
Why would Russia kill someone with a weapon that can specifically traced backed to them. That’s not too smart.
What am I suggesting?
I’m suggesting two things:
1. We don’t know and the fact the UK government won’t release the evidence – and that doesn’t help
2. Arms makers and the intelligence agencies they hold captive are having a field day
Brasscheck TV needs your help
Brasscheck TV relies on viewer contributions to keep going
[do_widget id=et-recent-posts-5]
From Hawaii to Iraq
100+ years of overthrows
The book is called “Overthrow” and it charts the 100+ year history of US-forced regime change.
“Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq” by Stephen Kinzer.
Why do we do it?
It’s not hard to figure out why.
There’s big money in it.
Stephen Kinzer received criticism from Noam Chomsky in his book “Manufacturing Consent” as a journalistic “errand boy” for the Regan administration.
This book may be an attempt to get on the right side of history and rehabilitate his reputation.
Note: This interview was recorded in 2006. His comments on Puerto Rico (how well we’ve taken care of it) are obviously 100% wrong.
Brasscheck TV needs your help
Brasscheck TV relies on viewer contributions to keep going
Nothing makes sense
Expert questions unanswered
The Secret Service provided the Ft. Lauderdale school with security training.
The FBI, not local police, were the first responders.
Students and teachers talked cleary about two or more shooters.
A school security expert talks about the total implausibility of the official story.
And let’s not forget Las Vegas
Las Vegas, when a middle aged, out of shape and partially disabled man with no combat shooting experience suddenly became an all-pro Special Ops shooter.
There is still NO video showing how all the weapons got to his hotel room or who else came and went from his room before (and after) the shooting. This in Las Vegas hotel which has hundreds of surveillance cameras.
Here’s a news segment that ran right after the shooting with analysis by a former Green Beret.
Brasscheck TV needs your help
Brasscheck TV relies on viewer contributions to keep going
A teacher-eye witness or talking heads from a New York TV studio?
Confirms student report of “army guy”
Who are you going to believe?
A teacher-eye witness or talking heads from a New York TV studio?
Florida shooter was in “full battle gear.”
This confirms a student report of “army guy” captured on video the day of the shooting.
The witness claims to have been talking to the alleged shooter who was unarmed – as shooting was taking place in another part of the school!
Best download this one.
The student eye witness video has been removed from YouTube and web sites are being threatened with account termination for running these videos.
The second video on our page on this story is still up.
https://www.brasscheck.com/video/two-shooters-at-florida-school/
Brasscheck TV needs your help
Brasscheck TV relies on viewer contributions to keep going
Here we go again
Drill, multiple shooters
Eye witnesses are very clear: two or more shooters.
One young woman said she talked with the unarmed gunman (!) while shooting was going on in another part of the building.
Interestingly, the clips were not from broadcast news media reports, but from people who filmed onsite news media interviews that were not put on the news.
Did the “code red” alarm sound before the shooting started? Several eye witnesses say that it did. How does that work?
Also, it was the second time the alarm had been sounded that day. Strange.
Brasscheck TV needs your help
Brasscheck TV relies on viewer contributions to keep going
You don’t need to be a scientist to have common sense
More smoke and mirrors from “scientist” Neil deGrasse Tyson
Neil deGrasse Tyson drops two total BS bombs in the first minute of this video. I’m surprised that Rogan who is usually a pretty intelligent guy fell for then. Maybe he thinks Tyson is a real scientist.
Here they are:
1) “Look at all the fuel they were loaded up with. It was enough to get to the moon” and 2) “It would have been harder to fake the landing than actually go to the moon.”
#1 – It was a multistage rocket. On a Saturn V, the first stage drops off after 2 minutes and 42 seconds. The second stage drops off after 9 minutes and 9 seconds so most of the “incredible” amount of fuel the ship was loaded with was gone in the first ten minutes. Something an “astrophysicist” should know. Even more important, who cares how much fuel was on the rocket? Any excess could have easily been dropped while they circled in earth orbit.
#2 – Tyson says it would be harder to take some staged photos and film and fool the news media (and the people who believe it) than ito put three men in a spacecraft on a 500,000+ mile round trip through the Van Allen radiation belt, onto and off the moon and back again. Really? That’s total and complete nonsense.
I don’t know what happened, but if these are Tyson’s arguments, he’s got nothing – which is usually the case with him.
Brasscheck TV needs your help
Brasscheck TV relies on viewer contributions to keep going
False flag terrorism and the strategy of tension
“We’re their real enemy”
24 years ago one independent journalist predicted EXACTLY where we’d be today.
John Judge saw the “Islamic terror fraud” coming from a mile away long before 9/11.
He knew who the “new” enemy was going to be. He knew that the “Muslim threat” was going to be used to consolidate power for the few and strip freedoms and economic power from the many.